CDF GROSS BREACH OF SEPARATION OF POWERS
BY
GEORGINA KEKEA
THE Constituency
Development Fund (CDF) audit report 2009 to 2012 has cited significant problems
with the CDF as a method of rural poverty relief.
The report released by
the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) says the use of such funds has a number
of serious deficiencies with breaching the separation of powers as one of them.
In 1978 when the
country gained independence, it committed itself to the
principle of ‘Separation of Powers’.
In the preamble to the
constitution it is clearly stated that all the power in the Solomon Islands
belongs to its people and is exercised on their behalf by the legislature, the
executive and the judiciary.
However in this
instance, the CDF is said to breach this principle. The CDF report stated that
the separation of power is meant to reduce the risk of poor governance by
limiting the authority of each branch of government.
The report says that this
division also allows citizens to seek redress if one of the branches should act
against their interests.
“In most recent
examples, the separation of powers has helped the judiciary and the legislature
to limit the power of the executive, as is the case when legislatures use audit
reports to hold the executive to account for the implementation of the budget.In
the budget system of democratic states, the most important manifestation of the
separation of powers is that the legislature enacts the budget and evaluates,
but is not directly involved in, its implementation. It determines the rules of
the game and pronounces on whether these have been followed but does not “play
the game” itself — it is the executive that manages and spends the budget”, the
CDF report says.
However the OAG noted
that the CDF schemes appear to breach the separation of powers by conferring
the executive powers of budget implementation on MPs.
The CDF report made
reference to a court in Kenya to explain what it means in this breach;“any outfit that is composed of Members of
Parliament and is charged with expenditure of public funds is mingling of roles
of the different organs of state in a manner that is unacceptable… it would be
against the constitutional principle of the separation of powers for Members of
Parliament to take part in actual spending, then submit their annual estimates
to themselves in Parliament through the Public Accounts Committee”.
The Public Accounts
Committee (PAC) is mandated to examine the public accounts prescribed by Section 38 of the
Finance and Audit Act 1978, together with the report of the Auditor General.
The PAC can also summon any public officer to give information on any
explanation or to produce any records or documents which the committee
requests.
According to information from the
National Parliament, another main area of responsibility of the PAC is to
consider the Draft Estimates prepared by the Government in support of the
Annual Appropriation Bill. The
Auditor-General or his nominee shall be the Secretary to the Committee and
shall make available to the Committee the services of his staff and other
facilities of his office.
ENDS///
Comments
Post a Comment