WOMEN ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT CAUSES HULLABALLOO IN HOMES
BY GEORGINA KEKEA
SEXUAL jealousy, disagreement over
disciplining of children, disagreement over spending priorities, men’s alcohol
consumption, men’s failure to work, men coercing women to work harder and
failure of wives to fulfill husbands’ expectations are some of the reasons of
marital conflict and violence in the home.
Australia’s Department of Pacific
Affairs study titled ‘Do no Harm’, reported that the most violence reported
during the research was connected to men’s alcohol consumption, which drains
resources from households. When women questioned their men in how they spend
their money, this in turn can cause conflict in the home.
The research found when women are
able to sustain themselves financially, this enabled men to lessen their
contributions to the household. In some cases men contribute nothing at all.
Because of this, they are able to use their money for their own personal
consumption resource and some act in a manner that often causes conflict in the
marriage.
In the report, an example was cited
on how women engaged themselves in financial activities such as savings club to
help them pay for their family’s needs. In Malaita, a woman called Gabrielle
told the researchers in how she used to hide her money from her husband as she
can’t trust him with money.
She told researchers of how at one
time, her husband spent SBD$45,000 (logging money) in Honiara with nothing left
for his family. She said they tried to
share funds and he (husband) wanted to spend the money on cigarettes and beer
and occasionally these conflicts led to violence.
She said the only way to resolve
the problems over money was to have their own separate money. Gabrielle says
she uses her income for the family and he uses his to do what he likes.
The study reported that domestic
conflicts also arise when men ask their wives for money for things that don’t
benefit the whole family, such as alcohol, cigarettes and betel nut.
The study said that women also reported
that men sometimes get jealous about them earning money and take the money out
of spite.
The study also suggested that
women’s income earning activities have led to a withdrawal of male
contributions to the household. So, although women may have become economically
empowered, this comes at the cost of increased workload, the report said.
The ‘do no harm’ report points to
the imbalance in workloads as a recurring theme across all the research sites
in Malaita, especially in Kiu. It was said that when men see women bringing
income into the household they feel enabled to opt out of contributing.
In Honiara, the report mentioned
that two women bemoaned the fact that their husbands would get angry with them
if they came home late from work.
In one case, this
was despite the woman’s workplace being far away so that travel to and from
work was time consuming. Other women spoke of their husbands’ controlling
behaviour, such as texting them incessantly to check on their whereabouts.
One man who was
university educated but without work, said that he and his wife argued over
decisions and support given to each other’s relatives. His wife complained that
he supported only his relatives, and not hers, and he complained that she only
supported her relatives.
The report said that many of the
women interviewed during the research endure a double, and sometimes a triple,
work burden which impacts on their security, health and well-being, leaving
them exhausted and in some cases ill.
Add to this male ‘backlash’ and
withdrawal of male contributions to the household, clearly it is essential that
women’s economic empowerment programming adopt a Do No Harm approach.
The report said for this to be
effective, there needs to be specific action to address social norms and
behaviour concerning violence, gender roles and gender relations and to ensure
prevention, protection and response. The Do No Harm research addresses the
question of how to improve women’s economic agency and the security of their
livelihoods without compromising their safety.
This report draws on primary
qualitative research in Solomon Islands (Makira-Ulawa Province, Malaita
Province and Honiara) that explores any connections between women’s economic
empowerment initiatives and increased violence against women, as well as other
problems that arise due to this change in women’s economic status.
It sought to capture the diversity
of ways that women endeavour to overcome economic disadvantage in contemporary
Melanesia.
Comments
Post a Comment